<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>philosophy on Pedro Rodriguez</title>
    <link>https://pedro.pjrt.dev/en/tags/philosophy/</link>
    <description>Recent content in philosophy on Pedro Rodriguez</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>All rights reserved</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://pedro.pjrt.dev/en/tags/philosophy/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Wilhoit&#39;s Law and Human Nature</title>
      <link>https://pedro.pjrt.dev/en/posts/2026-10-08-wilhoits-law-and-human-nature/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://pedro.pjrt.dev/en/posts/2026-10-08-wilhoits-law-and-human-nature/</guid>
      <description>I keep coming back to Wilhoit&amp;rsquo;s Law quite often, but there&amp;rsquo;s something that has always bothered me about it.
Wilhoit states that conservatism is the &amp;ldquo;only political system that exists&amp;rdquo;, and that anticonservatism is the only real alternative. And while anticonservatism has never existed, we clearly try to implement it: that&amp;rsquo;s what all the religions and political ideas like communism are trying to get to.
While I do agree with Wilhoit&amp;rsquo;s spectrum (I find it more informative than the usual left-right spectrum we see in political discourse), I can&amp;rsquo;t help but ask why: why is Conservatism the default?</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
